• Re-using Queries
• Data Size
• Maintenance Overhead
  • Index limitations
  • Some tables should not have any more indexes
  • Add index and make application code change together if possible
• Migration type to use
  • Add an index to improve existing queries
  • Add an index to support new or updated queries
    • New or updated queries perform slowly on GitLab.com
    • New or updated queries might be slow on a large GitLab instance
  • Add a unique index acting as a constraint to an existing table
• Dropping unused indexes
  • Finding possible unused indexes
  • Verifying that an index is unused
    • Investigating index usage
    • Investigating related queries
• Requirements for naming indexes
  • Considerations for index names
  • Why explicit names are required
• Testing for existence of indexes
• Temporary indexes
• Analyzing a new index before a batched background migration
• Indexes for partitioned tables
• Create indexes asynchronously
  • Schedule index creation for a low-impact time
  • Schedule the index to be created
  • Verify the MR was deployed and the index exists in production
  • Add a migration to create the index synchronously
    • Create the index synchronously for partitioned table
• Test database index changes locally
  • Verify indexes created asynchronously
• Drop indexes asynchronously
  • Schedule the index to be removed
  • Verify the MR was deployed and the index no longer exists in production
  • Add a migration to destroy the index synchronously
  • Verify indexes removed asynchronously

Adding Database Indexes

Indexes can be used to speed up database queries, but when should you add a new index? Traditionally the answer to this question has been to add an index for every column used for filtering or joining data. For example, consider the following query:

SELECT *
FROM projects
WHERE user_id = 2;

Here we are filtering by the user_id column and as such a developer may decide to index this column.

While in certain cases indexing columns using the above approach may make sense, it can actually have a negative impact. Whenever you write data to a table, any existing indexes must also be updated. The more indexes there are, the slower this can potentially become. Indexes can also take up significant disk space, depending on the amount of data indexed and the index type. For example, PostgreSQL offers GIN indexes which can be used to index certain data types that cannot be indexed by regular B-tree indexes. These indexes, however, generally take up more data and are slower to update compared to B-tree indexes.

Because of all this, it’s important make the following considerations when adding a new index:

1. Do the new queries re-use as many existing indexes as possible?
2. Is there enough data that using an index is faster than iterating over rows in the table?
3. Is the overhead of maintaining the index worth the reduction in query timings?

In some situations, an index might not be required:

• The table is small (less than 1,000 records) and it’s not expected to exponentially grow in size.
• Any existing indexes filter out enough rows.
• The reduction in query timings after the index is added is not significant.

Additionally, wide indexes are not required to match all filter criteria of queries. We just need to cover enough columns so that the index lookup has a small enough selectivity.

Re-using Queries

The first step is to make sure your query re-uses as many existing indexes as possible. For example, consider the following query:

SELECT *
FROM todos
WHERE user_id = 123
AND state = 'open';

Now imagine we already have an index on the user_id column but not on the state column. One may think this query performs badly due to state being unindexed. In reality the query may perform just fine given the index on user_id can filter out enough rows.

The best way to determine if indexes are re-used is to run your query using EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Depending on the joined tables and the columns being used for filtering, you may find an extra index doesn’t make much, if any, difference.

In short:

1. Try to write your query in such a way that it re-uses as many existing indexes as possible.
2. Run the query using EXPLAIN ANALYZE and study the output to find the most ideal query.

Data Size

A database may not use an index even when a regular sequence scan (iterating over all rows) is faster, especially for small tables.

Consider adding an index if a table is expected to grow, and your query has to filter a lot of rows. You may not want to add an index if the table size is small (<1,000 records), or if existing indexes already filter out enough rows.

Maintenance Overhead

Indexes have to be updated on every table write. In the case of PostgreSQL, all existing indexes are updated whenever data is written to a table. As a result, having many indexes on the same table slows down writes. It’s therefore important to balance query performance with the overhead of maintaining an extra index.

Let’s say that adding an index reduces SELECT timings by 5 milliseconds but increases INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE timings by 10 milliseconds. In this case, the new index may not be worth it. A new index is more valuable when SELECT timings are reduced and INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE timings are unaffected.

Index limitations

GitLab enforces a limit of 15 indexes per table. This limitation:

• Helps maintain optimal database performance
• Reduces maintenance overhead
• Prevents excessive disk space usage

{{< alert type=”note” >}}

If you need to add an index to a table that already has 15 indexes, consider:

{{< /alert >}}

• Removing unused indexes
• Combining existing indexes
• Using a composite index that can serve multiple query patterns

Some tables should not have any more indexes

We have RuboCop checks (PreventIndexCreation) against further new indexes on selected tables that are frequently accessed. This is due to LockManager LWLock contention.

For the same reason, there are also RuboCop checks (AddColumnsToWideTables) against adding new columns to these tables.

Add index and make application code change together if possible

To minimize the risk of creating unnecessary indexes, do these in the same merge request if possible:

• Make application code changes.
• Create or remove indexes.

The migrations that create indexes are usually short, and do not significantly increase a merge request’s size. Doing so allows backend and database reviewers to review more efficiently without switching contexts between merge requests or commits.

Migration type to use

The authoritative guide is the migration style guide. When in doubt, consult the guide.

Here are some common scenarios with a recommended choice as a quick reference.

Add an index to improve existing queries

Use a post-deployment migration. Existing queries already work without the added indexes, and would not critical to operating the application.

If indexing takes a long time to finish (a post-deployment migration should take less than 10 minutes) consider indexing asynchronously.

Add an index to support new or updated queries

Always examine the query plans for new or updated queries. First, confirm they do not time-out or significantly exceed the recommended query timings without a dedicated index.

If the queries don’t time-out or breach the query timings:

• Any index added to improve the performance of the new queries is non-critical to operating the application.
• Use a post-deployment migration to create the index.
• In the same merge request, ship the application code changes that generate and use the new queries.

Queries that time-out or breach query timings require different actions, depending on whether they do so only on GitLab.com, or for all GitLab instances. Most features require a dedicated index only for GitLab.com, one of the largest GitLab installations.

New or updated queries perform slowly on GitLab.com

Use two MRs to create the index in a post-deployment migration and make the application code change:

• The first MR uses a post-deployment migration to create the index.
• The second MR makes application code changes. It should merge only after the first MR’s post-deployment migrations are executed on GitLab.com.

{{< alert type=”note” >}}

If you can use a feature flag, you might be able to use a single MR to make the code changes behind the feature flag. Include the post-deployment migration at the same time. After the post-deployment migration executes, you can enable the feature flag.

{{< /alert >}}

For GitLab.com, we execute post-deployment migrations throughout a single release through continuous integration:

• At some time t, a group of merge requests are merged and ready to deploy.
• At t+1, the regular migrations from the group are executed on GitLab.com’s staging and production database.
• At t+2, the application code changes from the group start deploying in a rolling manner

After the application code changes are fully deployed, The release manager can choose to execute post-deployment migrations at their discretion at a much later time. The post-deployment migration executes one time per day pending GitLab.com availability. For this reason, you need a confirmation the post-deployment migrations included in the first MR were executed before merging the second MR.

New or updated queries might be slow on a large GitLab instance

It’s not possible to check query performance directly on GitLab Self-Managed instances. PostgreSQL produces an execution plan based on the data distribution, so guessing query performance is a hard task.

If you are concerned about the performance of a query on GitLab Self-Managed instances and decide that GitLab Self-Managed instances must have an index, follow these recommendations:

• For GitLab Self-Managed instances following zero-downtime upgrades, post-deploy migrations execute when performing an upgrade after the application code deploys.
• For GitLab Self-Managed instances that do not follow a zero-downtime upgrade, the administrator might choose to execute the post-deployment migrations for a release later, at the time of their choosing, after the regular migrations execute. The application code deploys when they upgrade.

For this reason, an application must not assume a database schema applied by the post-deployment migrations has shipped in the same release. The application code should continue to work without the indexes added in the post-deployment migrations in the same release.

You have two options depending on how long it takes to create the index:

1. Single release: if a regular migration can create the required index very fast (usually because the table is new or very small) you can create the index in a regular migration, and ship the application code change in the same MR and milestone.

2. At least two releases: if the required index takes time to create, you must create it in a PDM in one release then wait for the next release to make the application code changes that rely on the index.

Add a unique index acting as a constraint to an existing table

PostgreSQL’s unique index acts as a constraint. Adding one to an existing table can be tricky.

Unless the table is absolutely guaranteed to be tiny for GitLab.com and GitLab Self-Managed instances, you must use multiple post-deployment migrations over multiple releases to:

• Remove and(or) fix the duplicate records.
• Introduce a unique index constraining existing columns.

Refer to the multi-release approach outlined in the section for adding a NOT NULL constraint.

PostgreSQL’s unique index, unlike the regular constraints, cannot be introduced in a non-validated state. You must use PostgreSQL’s partial unique index and the application validation to enforce the desired uniqueness for new and updated records while the removal and fix are in progress.

The details of the work might vary and require different approaches. Consult the Database team, reviewers, or maintainers to plan the work.

Dropping unused indexes

Unused indexes should be dropped because they increase maintainence overhead, consume disk space, and can degrade query planning efficiency without providing any performance benefit. However, dropping an index that’s still used could result in query performance degradation or timeouts, potentially leading to incidents. It’s important to verify the index is unused on both on GitLab.com and self-managed instances prior to removal.

• For large tables, consider dropping the index asynchronously.
• For partitioned tables, only the parent index can be dropped. PostgreSQL does not permit child indexes (i.e. the corresponding indexes on its partitions) to be independently removed.

Finding possible unused indexes

To see which indexes are candidates for removal, you can run the following query:

SELECT relname as table_name, indexrelname as index_name, idx_scan, idx_tup_read, idx_tup_fetch, pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(indexrelname::regclass))
FROM pg_stat_all_indexes
WHERE schemaname = 'public'
AND idx_scan = 0
AND idx_tup_read = 0
AND idx_tup_fetch = 0
ORDER BY pg_relation_size(indexrelname::regclass) desc;

This query outputs a list containing all indexes that have not been used since the stats were last reset and sorts them by index size in descending order. More information on the meaning of the various columns can be found at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/monitoring-stats.html.

For GitLab.com, you can check the latest generated production reports on postgres.ai and inspect the H002 Unused Indexes file.

{{< alert type=”warning” >}}

These reports only show indexes that have no recorded usage since the last statistics reset. They do not guarantee that the indexes are never used.

{{< /alert >}}

Verifying that an index is unused

This section contains resources to help you evaluate an index and confirm that it’s safe to remove. Note that this is only a suggested guide and is not exhaustive. Ultimately, the goal is to gather enough data to justify dropping the index.

Be aware that certain factors can give the false impression that an index is unused, such as:

• There may be queries that run on self-managed but not on GitLab.com.
• The index may be used for very infrequent processes such as periodic cron jobs.
• On tables that have little data, PostgreSQL may initially prefer a sequential scan over an index scan until the table is large enough.

Investigating index usage

1. Start by gathering all the metadata available for the index, verifying its name and definition.
   • The index name in the development environment may not match production. It’s important to correlate the indexes based on definition rather than name. To check its definition, you can:
     • Manually inspect db/structure.sql (This file does not include data on dynamically generated partitions.)
     • Use Database Lab to check the status of an index.
   • For partitioned tables, child indexes are often named differently than the parent index. To list all child indexes, you can:
     • Run \d+ <PARENT_INDEX_NAME> in Database Lab.

     • Run the following query to see the full parent-child index structure in more detail:

       SELECT
         parent_idx.relname AS parent_index,
         child_tbl.relname AS child_table,
         child_idx.relname AS child_index,
         dep.deptype,
         pg_get_indexdef(child_idx.oid) AS child_index_def
       FROM
         pg_class parent_idx
       JOIN pg_depend dep ON dep.refobjid = parent_idx.oid
       JOIN pg_class child_idx ON child_idx.oid = dep.objid
       JOIN pg_index i ON i.indexrelid = child_idx.oid
       JOIN pg_class child_tbl ON i.indrelid = child_tbl.oid
       WHERE
         parent_idx.relname = '<PARENT_INDEX_NAME>';
       

2. For GitLab.com, you can view index usage data in Grafana.

   • Query the metric pg_stat_user_indexes_idx_scan filtered by the relevant index(s) for at least the last 6 months. The query below shows index usage across all database instances combined.

     sum by (indexrelname) (pg_stat_user_indexes_idx_scan{env="gprd", relname=~"<TABLE_NAME_REGEX>", indexrelname=~"<INDEX_NAME_REGEX>"})
     

   • For partitioned tables, we must check that all child indexes are unused prior to dropping the parent.

If the data shows that an index has zero or negligible usage, it’s a strong candidate for removal. However, keep in mind that this is limited to usage on GitLab.com. We should still investigate all related queries to ensure it can be safely removed for self-managed instances.

An index that shows low usage may still be dropped if we can confirm that other existing indexes would sufficiently support the queries using it. PostgreSQL decides which index to use based on data distribution statistics, so in certain situations it may slightly prefer one index over another even if both indexes adequately support the query, which may account for the occasional usage.

Investigating related queries

The following are ways to find all queries that may utilize the index. It’s important to understand the context in which the queries are or may be executed so that we can determine if the index either:

• Has no queries on GitLab.com nor on self-managed that depend on it.
• Can be sufficiently supported by other existing indexes.

1. Investigate the origins of the index.
   • Dig through the commit history, related merge requests, and issues that introduced the index.
   • Try to find answers to questions such as:
     • Why was the index added in the first place? What query was it meant to support?
     • Does that query still exist and get executed?
     • Is it only applicable to self-managed instances?
2. Examine queries outputted from running the rspec:merge-auto-explain-logs CI job.
   • This job collects and analyzes queries executed through tests. The output is saved as an artifact: auto_explain/auto_explain.ndjson.gz
   • Since we don’t always have 100% test coverage, this job may not capture all possible queries and variations.
3. Examine queries recorded in postgres logs on Kibana.

   • Generally, you can filter for json.sql values that contain the table name and at least one of the columns from the index definition (including conditions). Example KQL:

     json.sql: <TABLE_NAME> AND (json.sql: *<COLUMN_NAME_1>* OR json.sql: *<COLUMN_NAME_2>*)
     

   • While there are many factors that affect index usage, the query’s filtering and ordering clauses often have the most influence. So focus on finding queries with relevant columns in the predicate/conditions rather than in the SELECT clause.
   • Caveat: We only keep the last 7 days of logs and this data does not apply to self-managed usage.
4. Manually search through the GitLab codebase.
   • This process may be tedious but it’s the most reliable way to ensure there are no other queries we missed from the previous actions, especially ones that are infrequent or only apply to self-managed instances.
   • It’s possible there are queries that were introduced some time after the index was initially added, so we can’t always depend on the index origins; we must also examine the current state of the codebase.
   • To help direct your search, try to gather context about how the table is used and what features access it. Look for queries that involve any of the columns from the index definition, particularly those that are part of the filtering or ordering clauses.
   • Another approach is to conduct a keyword search for the model/table name and any relevant columns. However, this could be a trickier and long-winded process since some queries may be dynamically compiled from code across multiple files.

After collecting the relevant queries, you can then obtain EXPLAIN plans to help you assess if a query relies on the index in question. For this process, it’s necessary to have a good understanding of how indexes support queries and how their usage is affected by data distribution changes. We recommend seeking guidance from a database domain expert to help with your assessment.

Requirements for naming indexes

Indexes with complex definitions must be explicitly named rather than relying on the implicit naming behavior of migration methods. In short, that means you must provide an explicit name argument for an index created with one or more of the following options:

• where
• using
• order
• length
• type
• opclass

Considerations for index names

Check our Constraints naming conventions page.

Why explicit names are required

As Rails is database agnostic, it generates an index name only from the required options of all indexes: table name and column names. For example, imagine the following two indexes are created in a migration:

def up
  add_index :my_table, :my_column

  add_index :my_table, :my_column, where: 'my_column IS NOT NULL'
end

Creation of the second index would fail, because Rails would generate the same name for both indexes.

This naming issue is further complicated by the behavior of the index_exists? method. It considers only the table name, column names, and uniqueness specification of the index when making a comparison. Consider:

def up
  unless index_exists?(:my_table, :my_column, where: 'my_column IS NOT NULL')
    add_index :my_table, :my_column, where: 'my_column IS NOT NULL'
  end
end

The call to index_exists? returns true if any index exists on :my_table and :my_column, and index creation is bypassed.

The add_concurrent_index helper is a requirement for creating indexes on populated tables. Because it cannot be used inside a transactional migration, it has a built-in check that detects if the index already exists. In the event a match is found, index creation is skipped. Without an explicit name argument, Rails can return a false positive for index_exists?, causing a required index to not be created properly. By always requiring a name for certain types of indexes, the chance of error is greatly reduced.

Testing for existence of indexes

The easiest way to test for existence of an index by name is to use the index_name_exists? method, but the index_exists? method can also be used with a name option. For example:

class MyMigration < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
  INDEX_NAME = 'index_name'

  def up
    # an index must be conditionally created due to schema inconsistency
    unless index_exists?(:table_name, :column_name, name: INDEX_NAME)
      add_index :table_name, :column_name, name: INDEX_NAME
    end
  end

  def down
    # no op
  end
end

Keep in mind that concurrent index helpers like add_concurrent_index, remove_concurrent_index, and remove_concurrent_index_by_name already perform existence checks internally.

Temporary indexes

There may be times when an index is only needed temporarily.

For example, in a migration, a column of a table might be conditionally updated. To query which columns must be updated in the query performance guidelines, an index is needed that would otherwise not be used.

In these cases, consider a temporary index. To specify a temporary index:

1. Prefix the index name with tmp_ and follow the naming conventions.
2. Create a follow-up issue to remove the index in the next (or future) milestone.
3. Add a comment in the migration mentioning the removal issue.

A temporary migration would look like:

INDEX_NAME = 'tmp_index_projects_on_owner_where_emails_disabled'

def up
  # Temporary index to be removed in 13.9 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/1234
  add_concurrent_index :projects, :creator_id, where: 'emails_disabled = false', name: INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  remove_concurrent_index_by_name :projects, INDEX_NAME
end

Analyzing a new index before a batched background migration

Sometimes it is necessary to add an index to support a batched background migration. It is commonly done by creating two post deployment migrations:

1. Add the new index, often a temporary index.
2. Queue the batched background migration.

In most cases, no additional work is needed. The new index is created and is used as expected when queuing and executing the batched background migration.

Expression indexes, however, do not generate statistics for the new index on creation. Autovacuum eventually runs ANALYZE, and updates the statistics so the new index is used. Run ANALYZE explicitly only if it is needed right after the index is created, such as in the background migration scenario described above.

To trigger ANALYZE after the index is created, update the index creation migration to analyze the table:

# in db/post_migrate/

INDEX_NAME = 'tmp_index_projects_on_owner_and_lower_name_where_emails_disabled'
TABLE = :projects

disable_ddl_transaction!

def up
  add_concurrent_index TABLE, '(creator_id, lower(name))', where: 'emails_disabled = false', name: INDEX_NAME

  connection.execute("ANALYZE #{TABLE}")
end

ANALYZE should only be run in post deployment migrations and should not target large tables. If this behavior is needed on a larger table, ask for assistance in the #database Slack channel.

Indexes for partitioned tables

You cannot create indexes concurrently on partitioned tables. However, creating indexes non-concurrently holds a write lock on the table being indexed. Therefore, you must use CONCURRENTLY when you create indexes to avoid service disruption in a hot system.

As a workaround, the Database team has provided add_concurrent_partitioned_index. This helper creates indexes on partitioned tables without holding a write lock.

Under the hood, add_concurrent_partitioned_index:

1. Creates indexes on each partition using CONCURRENTLY.
2. Creates an index on the parent table.

A Rails migration example:

# in db/post_migrate/

class AddIndexToPartitionedTable < Gitlab::Database::Migration[2.1]
  include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers

  disable_ddl_transaction!

  TABLE_NAME = :table_name
  COLUMN_NAMES = [:partition_id, :id]
  INDEX_NAME = :index_name

  def up
    add_concurrent_partitioned_index(TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAMES, name: INDEX_NAME)
  end

  def down
    remove_concurrent_partitioned_index_by_name(TABLE_NAME, INDEX_NAME)
  end
end

Create indexes asynchronously

For very large tables, index creation can be a challenge to manage. While add_concurrent_index creates indexes in a way that does not block ordinary traffic, it can still be problematic when index creation runs for many hours. Necessary database operations like autovacuum cannot run, and on GitLab.com, the deployment process is blocked waiting for index creation to finish.

To limit impact on GitLab.com, a process exists to create indexes asynchronously during weekend hours. Due to generally lower traffic and fewer deployments, index creation can proceed at a lower level of risk.

Schedule index creation for a low-impact time

1. Schedule the index to be created.
2. Verify the MR was deployed and the index exists in production.
3. Add a migration to create the index synchronously.

Schedule the index to be created

1. Create a merge request containing a post-deployment migration, which prepares the index for asynchronous creation.
2. Create a follow-up issue to add a migration that creates the index synchronously.
3. In the merge request that prepares the asynchronous index, add a comment mentioning the follow-up issue.

An example of creating an index using the asynchronous index helpers can be seen in the block below. This migration enters the index name and definition into the postgres_async_indexes table. The process that runs on weekends pulls indexes from this table and attempt to create them.

# in db/post_migrate/

INDEX_NAME = 'index_ci_builds_on_some_column'

# TODO: Index to be created synchronously in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/XXXXX
def up
  prepare_async_index :ci_builds, :some_column, name: INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  unprepare_async_index :ci_builds, :some_column, name: INDEX_NAME
end

For partitioned table, use:

# in db/post_migrate/

include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers

PARTITIONED_INDEX_NAME = 'index_p_ci_builds_on_some_column'

# TODO: Partitioned index to be created synchronously in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/XXXXX
def up
  prepare_partitioned_async_index :p_ci_builds, :some_column, name: PARTITIONED_INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  unprepare_partitioned_async_index :p_ci_builds, :some_column, name: PARTITIONED_INDEX_NAME
end

{{< alert type=”note” >}}

prepare_partitioned_async_index only creates the indexes for partitions asynchronously. It doesn’t attach the partition indexes to the partitioned table. In the next step for the partitioned table, add_concurrent_partitioned_index will not only add the index synchronously but also attach the partition indexes to the partitioned table.

{{< /alert >}}

Verify the MR was deployed and the index exists in production

1. Verify that the post-deploy migration was executed on GitLab.com using ChatOps with /chatops run auto_deploy status <merge_sha>. If the output returns db/gprd, the post-deploy migration has been executed in the production database. For more information, see How to determine if a post-deploy migration has been executed on GitLab.com.
2. In the case of an index created asynchronously, wait until the next week so that the index can be created over a weekend.
3. Use Database Lab to check if creation was successful. Ensure the output does not indicate the index is invalid.

Add a migration to create the index synchronously

After the index is verified to exist on the production database, create a second merge request that adds the index synchronously. The schema changes must be updated and committed to structure.sql in this second merge request. The synchronous migration results in a no-op on GitLab.com, but you should still add the migration as expected for other installations. The below block demonstrates how to create the second migration for the previous asynchronous example.

{{< alert type=”warning” >}}

Verify that the index exists in production before merging a second migration with add_concurrent_index. If the second migration is deployed before the index has been created, the index is created synchronously when the second migration executes.

{{< /alert >}}

# in db/post_migrate/

INDEX_NAME = 'index_ci_builds_on_some_column'

disable_ddl_transaction!

def up
  add_concurrent_index :ci_builds, :some_column, name: INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  remove_concurrent_index_by_name :ci_builds, INDEX_NAME
end

Create the index synchronously for partitioned table

# in db/post_migrate/

include Gitlab::Database::PartitioningMigrationHelpers

PARTITIONED_INDEX_NAME = 'index_p_ci_builds_on_some_column'

disable_ddl_transaction!

def up
  add_concurrent_partitioned_index :p_ci_builds, :some_column, name: PARTITIONED_INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  remove_concurrent_partitioned_index_by_name :p_ci_builds, PARTITIONED_INDEX_NAME
end

Test database index changes locally

You must test the database index changes locally before creating a merge request.

Verify indexes created asynchronously

Use the asynchronous index helpers on your local environment to test changes for creating an index:

1. Enable the feature flags by running Feature.enable(:database_async_index_creation) and Feature.enable(:database_reindexing) in the Rails console.
2. Run bundle exec rails db:migrate so that it creates an entry in the postgres_async_indexes table.
3. Run bundle exec rails gitlab:db:execute_async_index_operations:all so that the index is created asynchronously on all databases.
4. To verify the index, open the PostgreSQL console using the GDK command gdk psql and run the command \d <index_name> to check that your newly created index exists.
   • For indexes created on partitions, check that a unique name has been autogenerated for that table \d gitlab_partitions_dynamic.<table_name>

Drop indexes asynchronously

For very large tables, index destruction can be a challenge to manage. While remove_concurrent_index removes indexes in a way that does not block ordinary traffic, it can still be problematic if index destruction runs for many hours. Necessary database operations like autovacuum cannot run, and the deployment process on GitLab.com is blocked while waiting for index destruction to finish.

To limit the impact on GitLab.com, use the following process to remove indexes asynchronously during weekend hours. Due to generally lower traffic and fewer deployments, index destruction can proceed at a lower level of risk.

1. Schedule the index to be removed.
2. Verify the MR was deployed and the index exists in production.
3. Add a migration to destroy the index synchronously.

Schedule the index to be removed

1. Create a merge request containing a post-deployment migration, which prepares the index for asynchronous destruction.
2. Create a follow-up issue to add a migration that destroys the index synchronously.
3. In the merge request that prepares the asynchronous index removal, add a comment mentioning the follow-up issue.

For example, to destroy an index using the asynchronous index helpers:

# in db/post_migrate/

INDEX_NAME = 'index_ci_builds_on_some_column'

# TODO: Index to be destroyed synchronously in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/XXXXX
def up
  prepare_async_index_removal :ci_builds, :some_column, name: INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  unprepare_async_index :ci_builds, :some_column, name: INDEX_NAME
end

This migration enters the index name and definition into the postgres_async_indexes table. The process that runs on weekends pulls indexes from this table and attempt to remove them.

You must test the database index changes locally before creating a merge request. Include the output of the test in the merge request description.

Verify the MR was deployed and the index no longer exists in production

1. Verify that the post-deploy migration was executed on GitLab.com using ChatOps with /chatops run auto_deploy status <merge_sha>. If the output returns db/gprd, the post-deploy migration has been executed in the production database. For more information, see How to determine if a post-deploy migration has been executed on GitLab.com.
2. In the case of an index removed asynchronously, wait until the next week so that the index can be removed over a weekend.
3. Use Database Lab to check if removal was successful. Database Lab should report an error when trying to find the removed index. If not, the index may still exist.

Add a migration to destroy the index synchronously

After you verify the index no longer exists in the production database, create a second merge request that removes the index synchronously. The schema changes must be updated and committed to structure.sql in this second merge request. The synchronous migration results in a no-op on GitLab.com, but you should still add the migration as expected for other installations. For example, to create the second migration for the previous asynchronous example:

{{< alert type=”warning” >}}

Verify that the index no longer exists in production before merging a second migration with remove_concurrent_index_by_name. If the second migration is deployed before the index has been destroyed, the index is destroyed synchronously when the second migration executes.

{{< /alert >}}

# in db/post_migrate/

INDEX_NAME = 'index_ci_builds_on_some_column'

disable_ddl_transaction!

def up
  remove_concurrent_index_by_name :ci_builds, name: INDEX_NAME
end

def down
  add_concurrent_index :ci_builds, :some_column, name: INDEX_NAME
end

Verify indexes removed asynchronously

To test changes for removing an index, use the asynchronous index helpers on your local environment:

1. Enable the feature flags by running Feature.enable(:database_reindexing) in the Rails console.
2. Run bundle exec rails db:migrate which should create an entry in the postgres_async_indexes table.
3. Run bundle exec rails gitlab:db:reindex destroy the index asynchronously.
4. To verify the index, open the PostgreSQL console by using the GDK command gdk psql and run \d <index_name> to check that the destroyed index no longer exists.